Software Vault: The Sapphire Collection/Software Vault (Sapphire Collection) (Digital Impact).ISO/cdr16/wired1_1.zip/LIBRARIE

Text File | 1994-09-18 | 23KB | 419 lines

***************************************************************************
********************* Wired InfoBot Copyright Notice **********************
***************************************************************************
************ All material retrieved from the Wired InfoBot is *************
***************** Copyright 1993 Wired, Rights Reserved. ******************
***************************************************************************
  Requesting information from the Wired InfoBot (other than the help file)
  indicates your acceptance of the following terms and conditions:

  (1) These articles and the contents thereof may be reposted, remailed,
      or redistributed to any publicly accessible electronic forum provi-
      ded that this notice remains attached and intact.

  (2) These articles may not under any circumstances be resold or redis-
      tributed for compensation without prior written agreement of Wired.

  (3) Wired keeps an archive of all electronic address of those requesting
      information from the Wired InfoBot. An electronic mailing list will
      be compiled from this archive.  This list may from time to time be
      used by the staff of Wired Online Services for the purpose of dis-
      tributing information deemed relevant to Wired's online readers.

      If you wish to have your name removed from this mailing list,
      please notify us by sending an electronic mail message to
      [e-mail].


  If you have any questions about these terms, or would like information
  about licensing materials from Wired, please contact us via telephone
  (+1.415.904.0660), fax [phone]), or email ([e-mail]).
***************************************************************************
**************************** G*E*T**W*I*R*E*D*! ***************************


What is the role of libraries in the Information Economy?

By John Browning


The world's great libraries share a great vision: Books once hoarded in
subterranean stacks will be scanned into computers and made available to
anyone, anywhere, almost instantly, over high-speed networks. A
researcher in San Francisco might, without leaving the desk, reach into
the database of the British Library to grab a copy of the Lindisfarne
Gospels, while another researcher in London rummages through the
collections of the Library of Congress trying to find various Federalist
Papers. Instead of fortresses of knowledge, there will be an ocean of
information.

Realizing this vision will transform libraries from guardians of
tradition to catalysts of a vast change. By breaking down the walls that
separate libraries from each other and from their users, librarians
dissolve the barriers that separate libraries from publishers. This will
change the economics of publishing, and with that, the way in which
ideas are disseminated and culture is made.

The key step in this process is how the digitized images of books and
journals are distributed from the libraries themselves. In the logic of
technology, this is a trivial and obvious thing to do. Today, librarians
spend increasing amounts of time and money copying text from paper -
either to send it to some remote researcher, or to save the text from
the decay of the paper on which it was printed. Many of those texts were
created in electronic form. Why not, the logic goes, cut out unnecessary
page-turning and work directly with the electronic version of the
document?

Some libraries already are. Perhaps the most ambitious plans are being
laid at the Bibliotheque de France, the French national library. Budget
permitting, it hopes to make electronic copies of 100,000 of the
"canonical works of the 20th century'' available electronically
throughout France and, perhaps, throughout the world. But the
Bibliotheque de France is not alone. At Boston Spa in Yorkshire, the
British Library runs a service which finds hard-to-locate journal
articles and other documents. Last year, it sent out more than 3 million
bits of text worldwide, mostly photocopies, but also an increasing
number of faxes. To cut down the sheer grunt work of copying text, the
British Library is experimenting with new forms of service. Instead of
receiving a printed journal from publishers, for example, it now
receives a CD-ROM containing digitized images of the articles from which
it prints out a new hard copy each time one is requested.

Such initiatives raise big questions. If someday in the future anybody
can get an electronic copy of any book from a library free of charge,
why should anyone ever set foot in a bookstore again? But if the books
on a library's electronic shelves are not free, what is left of the
distinction between library, printer and bookstore - and what is left of
the library's traditional raison d'etre: namely, making information
available to those who cannot afford to buy it?


In the Beginning There Were Words
*********************************
Libraries came into being because books are good for the soul, but
difficult to produce. In the beginning, libraries and publishing houses
were run in the same place by the same people - that is, by monks in a
scriptorium. Daniel Boorstin, a historian and former librarian of
Congress, reckons that if there is a patron saint of libraries, it is
Saint Benedict of Nursia, who in the sixth century founded the
Benedictine order of monasteries and set quills to illuminating paper
across Europe.

The monks guarded their work jealously. In England's Hereford Cathedral,
books were chained to the shelves. Although books were sometimes lent to
other monasteries, the consequences for failing to return them were
severe. In his book The Discoverers, Boorstin cites an inscription in a
12th century manuscript now in Oxford's Bodleian Library: "This book
belongs to the monastery of St. Mary of Robert's Bridge, whosoever shall
steal it, sell it or in any way alienate it from this house, or mutilate
it, let him be forever cursed. Amen.'' (Inevitably, this inscription is
followed by a note from a 14th century bishop of Exeter who states that,
whatever anybody else may have done, he got the book legitimately - so
rest his soul.)

While the monks practiced two of the key concepts of the modern library
- collecting books and guarding them for communal use - they lacked a
third: a system for organizing books so that they could be found later.
Most libraries simply had too few books to bother with a catalog. With
the spread of the printing press, however, the distinction between
library and publisher split - and the proliferation of books and
libraries required better technology for telling books apart: namely,
card catalogs and indexing systems. Card catalogs, in turn, helped
reinforce a new distinction that sprang up with the advent of printing:
that of authorship.

An author is someone whose views are considered so important and
interesting to a publisher that the publisher is willing to risk money
to bring those views to the public. Authors and (especially) would-be
authors have complained about the arbitrariness of this distinction
since before the printers of London balked at publishing Newton's
treatise on calculus. (Their grounds: mathematics books never sell.)
Changes in the technology of libraries and publishing may create
alternatives to the power of publisher - and soon.

Much of the necessary preliminary work of  automating card catalogs is
already done without anyone but librarians really noticing. The
automated card catalog, in turn, helps to raise the possibility of a new
electronic world in which all authors can be, in effect, their own
publishers. The publishers' power stems from the cost and difficulty of
printing. In an electronic world, "printing'' is trivial; anyone can
copy an electronic text with a few keystrokes. The really hard problem
in the electronic world is finding which text you might want to read or
to copy. Electronic card catalogs are an important first step towards
solving that problem.


Books by the Numbers
********************
>From your local neighborhood Internet network terminal, you can now
search the catalogs of thousands of libraries across the world. The
Library of Congress catalog is there: containing more than 20 million
entries. John Mahoney, head of computing at the British Library, says
that 12-15 million items in the British Library's electronic catalog
will become available over the British research network, JANET, by this
summer. By far the greatest contributions to online access to
information, however, come from Ohio, of all places.

In 1967, academic librarian Frederick Kilgour had two insights: first,
that all libraries soon would put their card catalogs on computer, and
second, that it was senseless for them all to duplicate the work of
typing text from cards into the machines. So he put together a
consortium of academic libraries from Ohio, got a bit of seed money from
the state legislature and began creating a cooperative card catalog
based on a shared database.

Today the OCLC, descendant of Kilgour's Ohio College Libraries Center,
enables more than 14,000 libraries, spread over 46 countries, to share a
database of about 26 million entries. Some 5,000 of these libraries are
general members that agree to share all of their catalog entries with
other OCLC members - so that once one member has made a catalog entry
for a new work, others can simply copy that entry rather than duplicate
the same effort. Not surprisingly, OCLC also runs an inter-library loan
service to help librarians get their hands on books that appear in the
shared database, but not on their own shelves.

Automated catalogs are a boon to researcher and librarian alike. The
OCLC has built a new service called EPIC that searches its online
catalog and enables a researcher to track down information by any, some,
or all sorts of indices - including author, title, publisher and
subject.

But the sheer ease with which researchers can now find their way through
vast collections often merely adds to their frustration. Though it takes
only a few seconds to locate a book or article in an automated catalog,
it then requires hours to bring it up from the stacks - or weeks to get
it on inter-library loan. Nor is the impatience of  researchers the only
factor pressuring libraries to extend the scope of automation from the
card catalog to the body of texts themselves.

On the contrary, more powerful forces are at work. One is the rapid
decay of most paper made since the mid-19th century, a time when
papermakers switched to acidic wood pulp as their raw material. Joseph
Price, head of technology at the Library of Congress, estimates that
each year 80,000 of the items on its shelves become so brittle that
their pages can no longer be turned. The only way to save the text is to
copy it onto another media. Today, the medium is typically microfiche,
but Price reckons it will soon be some form of optical disk.

But paper decay is only one force pushing libraries to move text onto
other media. Another is the rising cost of paper publications and the
difficulty in sharing them. Although many libraries can all plug into an
electronic database, far fewer can have a given book or magazine on
their shelves at any given time. Problem is, libraries can no longer
afford to have all the books and journals they feel they should have on
their shelves. Over the past few decades, the number and cost of
academic journals has skyrocketed.

If publishers and researchers are not to be caught in a vicious spiral,
whereby rising prices cause declining circulations and declining
circulations push prices further up, the pressure grows on libraries and
publishers alike to find new ways that enable researchers to get and to
pay for only those journal articles that are needed. Here's where new
technology can help.


Enter the Electric Book
***********************
Pushed from many directions, all of the world's libraries are moving
towards electronic distribution of text. But each is moving into the
electronic world in its own way. To see the differences, compare three
of the world's great libraries: the Library of Congress, the
Bibliotheque de France and the British Library.

The French, inevitably, approach automation with the most panache. They
are engineering a whole new national library, called the Tres Grande
Bibliotheque, which will start from a grand new building and build a
grand new foundation for France's libraries. According to Helene
Waysbord, one of the creators of this new vision, the library hopes to
strike a balance between conservation and diffusion - between protecting
heritage and communicating it. To that end, the project has several
strands. One is a new national library building: a monument to the book
now being constructed on the left bank of the Seine. Its four towers
stand at the corners of a sunken garden - at which researchers can gaze
through two-story windows while they work.

But in addition to building new walls, the French are also trying to
create a library without walls. Under the auspices of the Tres Grande
Bibliotheque (after the French high-speed trains, the Tres Grande
Vitesse), the automation of card catalogs has been accelerated. To go
with automated catalogs, the Bibliotheque de France will install 200
research workstations in the library's public areas when it opens in
1995.

The workstations will provide a network link to the card catalogs, note-
taking and bibliography software, and, most ambitious, a sort of
electronic notebook customized for work in electronic libraries. The
workstations are still in the early prototype stage, but the plan is to
allow a researcher to scan pages of text directly into a personal
database instead of photocopying them for hard files. Scanned text can
then be annotated, indexed, and searched by a variety of means.

Last and most ambitious of all, the Bibliotheque de France also has
begun creating a new sort of electronic library based not on paper, but
on the digitized images of books. It is busily scanning the pages of
100,000 great works of the 20th century as chosen by a committee of
notable French citizens. Through designated computer networks, these
books will be made available far beyond the walls of the library -
although the sheer amount of memory required to store the image and
contents of a book means that, for now, the ability to read these
electronic books will be limited to only those possessing both extremely
high-powered computers and extremely high-powered network connections.

The task of digitization is one in which France's dirigiste, centralized
bureaucracy can make rapid progress. First, as Waysbord points out,
France worries little about political correctness. French academics use
the phrase "cultural patrimony'' without ducking or sneering, and all
schools still teach the same lessons on the same day. Nobody is going to
complain too loudly that the Bibliotheque's list of great books over-
represents dead white males.

Equally important, there is a French tradition to push ahead with a big
idea and then sort out the commercial problems later. The bureaucracy
can brush aside publishers' concerns over the implications of electronic
distribution of texts with a speed and power that their English-speaking
counterparts could never match. For better or worse, that is how the
country got the Concorde, the Airbus, its nuclear power program, Minitel
- and now the electronic book.


The Woe of Walls
****************
By contrast, British and American librarians want to sort out the
economics of the electronic library from the very beginning.

The commercial consequences of electronic libraries could be huge - and
publishers' trade associations are already closely watching libraries
with a suspicious eye. More simply, the libraries do not want to be
stuck with loss-making electronic services that taxpayers are reluctant
to support.

The British Library reached the end of its taxpayers' patience with the
growth of overseas demand for faxes and photocopies of journal articles
>from the library's Document Supply Centre at Boston Spa in Yorkshire. So
it evolved a three-tier pricing system.

Basic library services are free - including access to reading rooms,
card catalogs, and most book, sound, map and picture collections.
Charges for supplying  documents from Boston Spa are limited to the
costs

of photocopying and transport when the service is provided to those
within the United Kingdom. But providing documents to foreigners is run
at a profit. Indeed, Boston Spa and a handful of other for-profit
services now bring in about $50 million of the British Library's $150
million-a-year budget.

In theory, the experience with Boston Spa should put the British Library
in an excellent position to blossom in the electronic world. Experiments
with distribution of electronic documents from CD-ROM have been
promising. So too has a link with the Colorado Association of Research
Libraries, which faxes to American libraries copies of the actual
journal articles whose citations have been found by searching online
catalogs.

Although Mahoney and his colleagues at the library are eager to push
ahead into the electronic world, a number of problems arise. One of the
more vexing questions concerns copyright. Copyright payments for
photocopied works in Britain are handled through a deal with the
Copyright Licensing Agency (CLA), which, like its American counterpart,
the Copyright Clearance Center, negotiates on behalf of publishers to
set and collect copyright charges from high-volume photocopiers like
libraries, universities and corporations. But publishers have not given
the CLA authority to negotiate deals for electronic publication, not
even for facsimile transmission.

The very idea of site licenses for photocopying is still a new one and
faces much resistance among would-be licensees. Although the CLA is
ready and willing to try to extend licensing to the electronic world,
publishers want to move slowly - in part because they want to
consolidate copyright deals with photocopiers, and in part because they
have arrived at a consensus among themselves over just how to face the
electronic future. Until the publishers decide how they want to face the
future, the future remains on hold.

Meanwhile, the British Library is caught in a managerial screw-up on a
scale only the British could inflict on themselves. Its new building,
across the road from St. Pancras railroad station in London, is now
running several years behind schedule, and at a cost of $700 million,
more than three times over budget. So much is wrong with the project
that no one is sure when it will open. While the British Library was not
responsible for mismanaging the construction - that dishonor falls to
another branch of government bureaucracy - it still has to pay the
rising bills. Paying for the building has cut book acquisition by more
than 40 percent - and it is wreaking similar havoc with automation
budgets and plans.


Mega-markets, Meta-markets
**************************
On the other side of the Atlantic, the Library of Congress is just
beginning its own budgetary debate. It is now forbidden by law for the
Library of Congress to charge more than the cost of reproducing
documents, plus 10 percent. As an add-on to experiments designed to test
the longevity of optical discs as an archival medium, Price put
photographs, sound and text onto an optical disc. The result made him
enthusiastic about the prospects for electronic publications combining
several media - marrying, say, Civil War photographs with letters and
other documents from the Library of Congress's vast collections. But
building such publications requires heavy research, the costs of which
the Library alone cannot recover. So the Library has asked for
legislation overturning the 10-percent restriction, but the proposal has
run into controversy.

The Information Industries Association, representing publishers, fears
that the legislation will unfairly set up government-subsidized
competition. The American Library Association, meanwhile, fears that the
legislation will set libraries on a slippery slope that will lead to the
elimination of free services. The Library of Congress is talking
compromise on both fronts. It says it will offer publishers a right of
first refusal on all of its electronic projects - though it is not clear
how this would work. Similarly it promises to give librarians a
guarantee that certain basic services will remain forever free.

Libraries will be a powerful force in the emerging world of electronic
information, so the debate merits time and attention. How, for example,
might the cost and convenience of combining electronic clippings from
libraries compare with customized electronic journals from publishers?
What happens to the publishing industry when publishers can reduce their
risks by not printing any copies of all but the most popular journals on
paper - but instead can wait for interested readers to print their own
copies of the articles they want from (taxpayer subsidized) library
databases?

None of these changes will happen overnight. Until there is a
universally agreed and available formatting language - which is still a
long way off - librarians plan to work with bit-mapped images of books.
The electronic image of a book is still a few gigabytes worth of
information, and a gigabyte is a helluva lot of data - several times
more than what fits into most of today's computers or flows conveniently
through computer networks. But as the changes add up over time, those
most transformed may well be libraries themselves.

The logic of technology makes librarians and editors increasingly
interchangeable. By lowering the costs of reproduction, and thus
increasing the amount of information published, new technology increases
the value of the judgments made by librarians and online searchers as
they pick and choose what their customers might want to read.
Eventually, publication may come to mean no more than somebody grabbing
a document from the author's networked computer. Even before that, the
editorial judgment of the librarian attains value and importance equal
to that of the editor - and a paradox arises.

If libraries do not charge for electronic books, not only can they not
reap rewards commensurate with their own increasing importance, but
libraries can also put publishers out of business with free competition.
If libraries do charge, that will disenfranchise people from information
- a horrible thing. There is no obvious compromise. It is not really
satisfactory either to cripple the technology so that libraries'
digitized texts can be read on-screen, say, but not stored; or to divvy
information into two categories: the free (paid for by the taxpayer) and
the commercial (paid for by the consumer).  But compromise is badly
needed - the technology is on the verge of transforming the great
libraries' vision of paradise into a global reality. ===



Copyright (c) 1993 Wired Magazine